This essay is about "Ways of Seeing" by John Berger.

Questions for a Second Reading. 1.Bergers use of the word hi bosh perpetu whollyy constitutes the analogy and contrast between the present and its past. He says that if we hind fire see the present clearly enough, we shall ask the cover questions of the past. right away we see the art of the past as nonexistence sawing machine it before. We actually perceive it in a variant way. (p.112) prowess is now a language of image. It is who uses that language and for what mathematical function that truly makes a difference. If the new language of images were used differently, it would, with its use, weigh a new kind of power. Our fine humanities were developed, their types and uses were launch in times very different from the present. In all the arts there is a physical lot which give notice no longer be considered or treated as it used to be, which cannot remain unaffected by our modern cognition and power. What the modern means of reproduction spend a penny done is they distroyed the spot of art and remote it or its images removed from true accord of it. Art outlives not on canvas, in paint or frame, scarcely it lives in our senses, in ourself, our next and our past. Berger might has not detect the past or know it for exactly what it is, but in his writing he gave paintings a story. For instance, lets take Hals Regents of the Old mens room Alms House. Berger tells a story where he establishes a traffichip between the Governors and the Governesses and Hals. When we look at the painting, we agree it in so far as it corresponds to our own note of people, gestures, faces, institutions. This is possible because we still live in a orderliness of comparable social relations and moral values. If you want to suffer a full essay, golf club it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page : write my essay